Search for: All records

Abstract The Generalized Hamming weights and their relative version, which generalize the minimum distance of a linear code, are relevant to numerous applications, including coding on the wire-tap channel of type II,t-resilient functions, bounding the cardinality of the output in list decoding algorithms, ramp secret sharing schemes, and quantum error correction. The generalized Hamming weights have been determined for some families of codes, including Cartesian codes and Hermitian one-point codes. In this paper, we determine the generalized Hamming weights of decreasing norm-trace codes, which are linear codes defined by evaluating sets of monomials that are closed under divisibility on the rational points of the extended norm-trace curve given by$$x^{u} = y^{q^{s - 1}} + y^{q^{s - 2}} + \cdots + y$$ $x^u=y^{q^{s-1}}+y^{q^{s-2}}+\cdots +y$over the finite field of cardinality$$q^s$$ $q^s$, whereuis a positive divisor of$$\frac{q^s - 1}{q - 1}$$ $\frac{q^s-1}{q-1}$. As a particular case, we obtain the weight hierarchy of one-point norm-trace codes and recover the result of Barbero and Munuera (2001) giving the weight hierarchy of one-point Hermitian codes. We also study the relative generalized Hamming weights for these codes and use them to construct impure quantum codes with excellent parameters. 

Abstract CSS-T codes were recently introduced as quantum error-correcting codes that respect a transversal gate. A CSS-T code depends on a CSS-T pair, which is a pair of binary codes$$(C_1, C_2)$$ $(C_1,C_2)$such that$$C_1$$ $C_1$contains$$C_2$$ $C_2$,$$C_2$$ $C_2$is even, and the shortening of the dual of$$C_1$$ $C_1$with respect to the support of each codeword of$$C_2$$ $C_2$is self-dual. In this paper, we give new conditions to guarantee that a pair of binary codes$$(C_1, C_2)$$ $(C_1,C_2)$is a CSS-T pair. We define the poset of CSS-T pairs and determine the minimal and maximal elements of the poset. We provide a propagation rule for nondegenerate CSS-T codes. We apply some main results to Reed–Muller, cyclic and extended cyclic codes. We characterize CSS-T pairs of cyclic codes in terms of the defining cyclotomic cosets. We find cyclic and extended cyclic codes to obtain quantum codes with better parameters than those in the literature. 

[Formula: see text]A hyperbolic code is an evaluation code that improves a Reed–Muller code because the dimension increases while the minimum distance is not penalized. We give necessary and sufficient conditions, based on the basic parameters of the Reed–Muller code, to determine whether a Reed–Muller code coincides with a hyperbolic code. Given a hyperbolic code [Formula: see text], we find the largest Reed–Muller code contained in [Formula: see text] and the smallest Reed–Muller code containing [Formula: see text]. We then prove that similar to Reed–Muller and affine Cartesian codes, the [Formula: see text]th generalized Hamming weight and the [Formula: see text]th footprint of the hyperbolic code coincide. Unlike for Reed–Muller and affine Cartesian codes, determining the [Formula: see text]th footprint of a hyperbolic code is still an open problem. We give upper and lower bounds for the [Formula: see text]th footprint of a hyperbolic code that, sometimes, are sharp.